Alibek Kachmazov vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kachmazov vs N. Fatic

Alibek Kachmazov

RUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

373

C. Rank

225

161

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$169.7K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

373

C. Rank

225

161

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$169.7K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Kachmazov 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Alibek Kachmazov winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Alibek Kachmazov and Nerman Fatic was at the Shanghai Challenger, 03-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Alibek Kachmazov getting the victory 6-3 7-6(7).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Kachmazov	1
Fatic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Shanghai Challenger(09-03-24)

Stats

Alibek Kachmazov

Nerman Fatic

A. Kachmazov vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

A. Kachmazov	Stats	N. Fatic
$169,735	Career Prize Money	$73,995
58.86% (206-144)	Career Total W/L	58.47% (404-287)
1	Hard	0
8	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-2)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

A. Kachmazov vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Alibek Kachmazov has won 46.38% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Alibek Kachmazov, in recent form, has won 48.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.34% and 27.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Alibek Kachmazov has saved 54.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Alibek Kachmazov has won 43.24% of matches played (W/L 16/21), with Nerman Fatic winning 72.31% (W/L 47/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Alibek Kachmazov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 86/42), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Alibek Kachmazov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 13/13), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Alibek Kachmazov winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Alibek Kachmazov winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0.
The last match between Alibek Kachmazov and Nerman Fatic was at the Shanghai Challenger, 03-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Alibek Kachmazov getting the victory 6-3 7-6(7).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:9.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Alibek Kachmazov has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.24 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 323.83.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Alibek Kachmazov has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Alibek Kachmazov has converted 26.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Alibek Kachmazov vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Kachmazov vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Kachmazov	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
10	Aces (Total)	16
4	Total Double Faults	4
1:43:9	Average Match Time	1:43:9
51% (36/71)	1st Serve %	60% (44/73)
86% (31/36)	1st Serve Win %	73% (32/44)
54% (19/35)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (13/29)
25% (2/8)	Break Pts Won %	25% (1/4)
38% (28/73)	Return Points Win %	30% (21/71)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Kachmazov Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025
Q1 Titouan DroguetT. Droguet	L	6-1 4-2 ret.	Stats
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati - 04-08-2025
Q1 Alexander BlockxA. Blockx	L	4-2 ret.	Stats
Lexington Challenger - 28-07-2025
R2 Nishesh BasavareddyN. Basavareddy	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
R1 Beibit ZhukayevB. Zhukayev	W	7-6(3) 6-7(2) 7-6(1)	Stats
Bloomfield Hills Challenger - 21-07-2025
R1 Aidan MayoA. Mayo	L	7-6(5) 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

A. Kachmazov vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Kachmazov	Stats	N. Fatic
58.86% (206/144)	YTD Win/Loss	58.47% (404/287)
57.14% (460/345)	Sets Win/Loss	57.49% (890/658)
52.27% (4066/3713)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7602/6734)
56.52% (91/70)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
48.21% (27/29)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
67.18% (88/43)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (20/26)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.42	Aces Per Game	0.23
1594	Aces Total	1598
0.28	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
1052	Total Double Faults	1517
1:46:33	Average Match Time	1:20:1
456.72	Average Opponent Rank	509.47
56% (13680/24385)	1st Serve %	66% (23791/35820)
70% (9569/13680)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15579/23791)
51% (5452/10704)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5772/12029)
41% (1018/2454)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1969/4222)
40% (9700/24207)	Return Points Win %	43% (15618/36165)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
0.00% (0/3)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
59.09% (13/9)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
55.56% (95/76)	Challenger W/L	52.89% (119/106)
65.10% (97/52)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
59% (200/341)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/662)
67% (2/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
60% (78/130)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
52% (57/109)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/189)
86% (209/179)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (394/348)
13% (209/28)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (394/42)
18% (141/26)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (297/57)